Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dakshana Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 01:34, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

The Dakshana Foundation

The Dakshana Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable with a certainly unacceptable current version and the best my searches found was this, this, this, this and this. Pinging Magioladitis, Rkmallik and Brainy J. SwisterTwister talk 06:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:48, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

• Delete. promotional and nonnotable. Coaching schools and organizations are almost never considered notable here. DGG ( talk ) 20:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

• Delete. Agree with David's interpretation. Agricola44 (talk) 17:14, 6 November 2015 (UTC).
• Delete - nothing but trivial mentions and press releases in the searches. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:33, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.