Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Napoleon Blownaparts
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 07:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- The Napoleon Blownaparts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references, does not seem to meet WP:GNG Shaded0 (talk) 02:51, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:51, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:51, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Funny name redirect to... um... er... the bin! - Seriously - Delete Per obvious failure of WP:GNG and applicable specific guidelines. Google has got lots of sites advertising their music, various fanpages, some mentions on music sites etc, but no independent reliable sources. Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) - 12:09, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. The vast majority of the content fails WP:V and the band doesn't appear to satisfy any of the criteria of WP:NBAND. No significant coverage found in reliable sources. --Michig (talk) 11:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.