Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Haq (al Qaida leader)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I am only deleting the nominated article - if you want the other 2 deleted, I would suggest AfDing those separately. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 10:01, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Abdul Haq (al Qaida leader) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:N IQinn (talk) 03:21, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
IQuinn - I am seeking clarification of this person from User:Geo Swan. I have brought this up on his talkpage concerning other names similar to "Abdul Haq" which are as follows:
Please be advised that I am still waiting for a response from User:Geo Swan if two or maybe all threee are the same person. If they are the same person or a second person, there could be at least one less wikipedia page. Adamdaley (talk) 03:57, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Response here. Geo Swan (talk) 23:59, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bradjamesbrown (talk) 00:07, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all. If we can't even determine if they are the same person, I would say that's definitive proof that the coverage cited in the articles does not meet the significant coverage requirements of WP:GNG. --Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 00:47, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. There are no authoritative sources that state that King Scorpion and Narmer are different persons, and we can't even determine if they are the same person. Is that definitive proof neither is adequately covered so that both articles should be deleted? (This is a rhetorical question. Don't quote WP:OTHERSTUFF now – I'm just using this as an example to show that the argument as presented does not hold water.) --Lambiam 21:42, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Very well, show me the reliable sources that have studied these various Abdul Haq's and the debate raging over whether they are the same person. The reason those sources don't exist is because there is not significant coverage of any of these individuals. --Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 06:28, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. There are no authoritative sources that state that King Scorpion and Narmer are different persons, and we can't even determine if they are the same person. Is that definitive proof neither is adequately covered so that both articles should be deleted? (This is a rhetorical question. Don't quote WP:OTHERSTUFF now – I'm just using this as an example to show that the argument as presented does not hold water.) --Lambiam 21:42, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 01:47, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.